@incollection{altman_indigenous_2015,
	address = {Victoria, AUSTRALIA},
	title = {Indigenous land and sea management: {Recognition}, redistribution, representation},
	isbn = {978-1-4863-0168-3},
	url = {https://ebooks-publish-csiro-au.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/content/ten-commitments-revisited},
	booktitle = {Ten {Commitments} {Revisited} : {Securing} {Australia}'s {Future} {Environment}},
	publisher = {CSIRO Publishing},
	author = {Altman, Jon and Jackson, Sue},
	editor = {Morton, Steve and Lindenmayer, David and Dovers, Stephen},
	year = {2015},
	keywords = {Landscape architecture, Urban planning},
}

@article{hartwig_benchmarking_2021,
	title = {Benchmarking {Indigenous} water holdings in the {Murray}-{Darling} {Basin}: a crucial step towards developing water rights targets for {Australia}},
	volume = {25},
	issn = {1324-1583},
	shorttitle = {Benchmarking {Indigenous} water holdings in the {Murray}-{Darling} {Basin}},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2021.1970094},
	doi = {10.1080/13241583.2021.1970094},
	abstract = {Australia’s ability to address Indigenous claims for water rights and to advance both national Indigenous and water policy is hampered by a lack of information on Indigenous water entitlements and the communities that hold them. This paper contributes to the policy agenda of increasing Indigenous water rights by developing a method that quantifies and enables spatially explicit comparison of Indigenous-held water within and across Murray-Darling Basin jurisdictions. We construct baselines for (i) Indigenous population (ii) Indigenous holdings of surface water entitlements, and (iii) Indigenous holdings of groundwater entitlements across water management units in the Basin. We estimate that Indigenous surface water holdings constitute no more than 0.17\% of the equivalent permitted take across the entire Basin. Groundwater entitlements held by Indigenous entities constitute 0.02\% of all available groundwater. The approximate market value of these water entitlements is A{\textbackslash}19.2 million in 2015–16 terms, which equates to 0.12\% of the total {\textbackslash}16.5 billion market value. In contrast, 5.3\% of the Murray-Darling Basin population is Indigenous, a proportion that is rapidly increasing. The production of estimates of this type, and Indigenous control of the data needed to generate them, are first steps in a reparations process that can contribute towards Indigenous water justice.},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2023-05-09},
	journal = {Australasian Journal of Water Resources},
	author = {Hartwig, Lana D and Markham, Francis and Jackson, Sue},
	month = jul,
	year = {2021},
	note = {Publisher: Taylor \& Francis
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2021.1970094},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {98--110},
}

@article{hartwig_water_2021,
	title = {Water colonialism and {Indigenous} water justice in south-eastern {Australia}},
	volume = {38},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07900627.2020.1868980},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1868980},
	number = {1},
	journal = {International Journal of Water Resources Development},
	author = {Hartwig, Lana D. and Jackson, Sue and Markham, Francis and Osborne, Natalie},
	year = {2021},
	note = {ZSCC: 0000003 
Publisher: Taylor \& Francis},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {30--63},
}

@book{jackson_planning_2017,
	title = {Planning in {Indigenous} {Australia}},
	url = {https://cat2.lib.unimelb.edu.au:443/record=b6449721~S30},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {Jackson, Sue and Porter, Libby and Johnson, Louise C.},
	year = {2017},
	note = {ZSCC: 0000037},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
}

@incollection{jackson_towards_2017,
	title = {Towards a new planning history and practice},
	isbn = {1-315-69366-6},
	url = {https://cat2.lib.unimelb.edu.au:443/record=b7211294~S30},
	booktitle = {Planning in {Indigenous} {Australia}},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {Jackson, Sue and Johnson, Louise C and Porter, Libby},
	year = {2017},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {236--244},
}

@article{jackson_politics_2022,
	title = {The politics of evaporation and the making of atmospheric territory in {Australia}’s {Murray}-{Darling} {Basin}},
	volume = {5},
	issn = {2514-8486},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/25148486211038392},
	doi = {10.1177/25148486211038392},
	abstract = {Scholarship on the hydrosocial cycle has tended to overlook the atmospheric phase of the cycle. This paper identifies and conceptualises a politics of evaporation in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin. Evaporation is not a neutral hydrological concept to be understood, measured or acted on without an appreciation of the networks in which it originates, the geo-political circumstances that continue to shape its circulation, and its socio-spatial effects. The politics of evaporation is conceptualised here as a process of hydrosocial territorialisation in which atmospheric water came to be known as a force acting within a balanced hydrologic cycle, and ‘atmospheric territory’ was created. The scientific origins of evaporation show (i) how modernist hydrologic technologies and conventions that relied on containment and territorialisation to account for and control water led to the negative depiction of evaporation as a loss, and (ii) the historical depth of processes of abstraction and commensuration that are so influential in today’s regimes of water accounting and marketisation. The politics of evaporation is identified empirically in the controversy surrounding the management of the Menindee Lakes and the lower Darling River in New South Wales, where efforts to ‘save’ water according to the logic of efficiency have enrolled atmospheric water into a Basin-wide program to redistribute surface water. The lens of evaporation theorises a neglected aspect of the materiality of water that is particularly important to the dry, hot parts of the world. It challenges us to rethink the ‘cycle’ as well as the ‘hydro’, while providing further evidence of the value of thinking about territory in a material register as volumetric and not areal.},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2023-05-09},
	journal = {Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space},
	author = {Jackson, Sue and Head, Lesley},
	month = sep,
	year = {2022},
	note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {1273--1295},
}

@article{jackson_town_2022,
	title = {Town {Scheming}: {The} {Kenbi} {Aboriginal} {Land} {Claim} and the {Role} of {Planning} in {Securing} {Possession}},
	issn = {1538-5132},
	shorttitle = {Town {Scheming}},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15385132221128510},
	doi = {10.1177/15385132221128510},
	abstract = {This article provides a detailed history of Australia’s longest running Indigenous land claim (1978–2016), made by the Larrakia traditional owners to the coastal hinterland of Darwin, under Australia’s first land rights legislation. It reveals the efforts of the state and its planners to exercise territorial control and establish a racialised socio-political order through planning legislation and land use plans. Institutions designed to return land to Indigenous peoples represent a critical site of inquiry for understanding not only how injustice is reproduced and resisted in settler colonial contexts but how settler colonial urbanism is made and remade as imperial power.},
	urldate = {2023-05-09},
	journal = {Journal of Planning History},
	author = {Jackson, Sue},
	month = oct,
	year = {2022},
	note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {15385132221128510},
}

@article{johnson_reframing_2017,
	title = {Reframing and revising {Australia}’s planning history and practice},
	volume = {54},
	issn = {0729-3682},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07293682.2018.1477813},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2018.1477813},
	number = {4},
	journal = {Australian Planner},
	author = {Johnson, Louise and Porter, Libby and Jackson, Sue},
	year = {2017},
	note = {Number: 4
Publisher: Taylor \& Francis},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {225--233},
}

@article{maclean_ngemba_2012,
	title = {Ngemba water values and interests: {Ngemba} {Old} {Mission} {Billabong} and {Brewarrina} {Aboriginal} fish traps ({Baiame}’s {Nguunhu})},
	shorttitle = {Ngemba water values and interests},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.4225/08/584d948534b2d},
	journal = {Canberra: CSIRO},
	author = {Maclean, Kirsten and Bark, Rosalind H. and Moggridge, Bradley and Jackson, Sue and Pollino, Carmel},
	year = {2012},
	note = {ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]},
	keywords = {Landscape architecture, Urban planning},
}

@article{odonnell_racialized_2022,
	title = {Racialized water governance: the ‘hydrological frontier’ in the {Northern} {Territory}, {Australia}},
	volume = {26},
	issn = {1324-1583},
	shorttitle = {Racialized water governance},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2022.2049053},
	doi = {10.1080/13241583.2022.2049053},
	abstract = {Increased scrutiny and contestation over recent water allocation practices and licencing decisions in the Northern Territory (NT) have exposed numerous inadequacies in its regulatory framework. Benchmarking against the National Water Initiative shows that NT lags behind national standards for water management. We describe key weaknesses in NT’s water law and policy, particularly for Indigenous rights and interests. NT is experiencing an acceleration of development, and is conceptualised as a ‘hydrological frontier’, where water governance has institutionalised regulatory spaces of inclusion and exclusion that entrench and (re)produce inequities and insecurities in water access. Regulations demarcate spaces in which laws and licencing practices provide certainty and security of rights for some water users, with opportunities to benefit from water development and services, while leaving much of NT (areas predominantly owned and occupied by Indigenous peoples) outside these legal protections. Water allocation and planning, as well as water service provision, continue to reinforce and reproduce racialised access to (and denial of) water rights. Combining an analysis of the law and policies that apply to water for economic development with those designed to regulate domestic water supply, we present a comprehensive and current picture of water insecurity for Indigenous peoples across the NT.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2023-05-09},
	journal = {Australasian Journal of Water Resources},
	author = {O’Donnell, Erin and Jackson, Sue and Langton, Marcia and Godden, Lee},
	month = jan,
	year = {2022},
	note = {Publisher: Taylor \& Francis
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2022.2049053},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {59--71},
}

@incollection{porter_indigenous_2017,
	title = {Indigenous {Planning}: {Emerging} {Possibilities}},
	shorttitle = {Indigenous {Planning}},
	booktitle = {Planning in {Indigenous} {Australia}},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {Porter, Libby and Jackson, Sue and Johnson, Louise C.},
	year = {2017},
	note = {ZSCC: 0000002},
	pages = {214--235},
}

@article{porter_remaking_2019,
	title = {Remaking imperial power in the city: {The} case of the {William} {Barak} building, {Melbourne}},
	volume = {37},
	issn = {0263-7758},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0263775819852362},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819852362},
	number = {6},
	journal = {Environment and Planning D: Society and Space},
	author = {Porter, Libby and Jackson, Sue and Johnson, Louise},
	year = {2019},
	note = {Number: 6
Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England},
	keywords = {Urban planning},
	pages = {1119--1137},
}