@techreport{cripps_improving_2019,
	address = {Melbourne},
	title = {Improving housing and service responses to domestic and family violence for {Indigenous} individuals and families},
	url = {https://ssrn.com/abstract=3545703},
	number = {AHURI Final Report No. 320},
	institution = {Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited},
	author = {Cripps, Kyllie and Habibis, Daphne},
	year = {2019},
	note = {Number: 320},
	keywords = {Architecture, Urban planning},
}

@article{grealy_sustaining_2022,
	title = {Sustaining housing through planned maintenance in remote {Central} {Australia}},
	volume = {0},
	issn = {0267-3037},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2084045},
	doi = {10.1080/02673037.2022.2084045},
	abstract = {Once housing is constructed, its sustainability depends on the efficacy of property maintenance. In remote Indigenous communities in Australia, responsive or reactive approaches to property maintenance dominate over planned and preventive attention, leaving housing in various states of disrepair. By documenting an approach that is succeeding in this wider context, this article shows the commonplace situation of poorly maintained social housing is entirely interruptible. It does so by examining an alternative and exceptional approach taken on the remote Aṉangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands in South Australia, where housing benefits from a planned maintenance program combined with an environmental health program. Through detailed empirical analysis of program datasets, interviews, and ethnographic fieldwork, this article describes the expert, systematic, and attentive work required to sustain functional housing in the wider context of undersupply, crowding, and challenging environmental conditions. We argue for the necessity of planned maintenance approaches as an essential component of sustainable housing, both to extend the life of housing assets and to ensure householder health and wellbeing.},
	number = {0},
	urldate = {2023-05-09},
	journal = {Housing Studies},
	author = {Grealy, Liam and Lea, Tess and Moskos, Megan and Benedict, Richard and Habibis, Daphne and King, Stephanie},
	month = jun,
	year = {2022},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2084045},
	keywords = {Architecture, Indigenous housing policy, Maintenance, Property, environmental health, healthy housing, housing quality, sustainability},
	pages = {1--23},
}

@article{habibis_australian_2013,
	title = {Australian {Housing} {Policy}, {Misrecognition} and {Indigenous} {Population} {Mobility}},
	volume = {28},
	issn = {0267-3037},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.759545},
	doi = {10.1080/02673037.2013.759545},
	abstract = {Policy initiatives in remote Indigenous Australia aim to improve Indigenous health and well-being, and reduce homelessness. But they have raised controversy because they impinge on Indigenous aspirations to remain on homeland communities, require mainstreaming of Indigenous housing and transfer Indigenous land to the state. This paper uses recognition theory to argue that if policies of normalization are imposed on remote living Indigenous people in ways that take insufficient account of their cultural realities they may be experienced as a form of misrecognition and have detrimental policy effects. The paper examines the responses of remote living Indigenous people to the National Partnerships at the time of their introduction in 2009–2010. Drawing on interview and administrative data from a national study on Indigenous population mobility, the paper argues although the policies have been welcomed, they have also been a source of anxiety and anger. These feelings are associated with a sense of violated justice arising from experiences of misrecognition. The paper argues this can lead tenants to depart their homes as a culturally sanctioned form of resistance to state control. This population mobility is associated with homelessness because it takes place in the context of housing exclusion. Policy implications include developing new models of intercultural professional practice and employing a capacity-building approach to local Indigenous organisations.},
	number = {5},
	urldate = {2023-05-09},
	journal = {Housing Studies},
	author = {Habibis, Daphne},
	month = jul,
	year = {2013},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.759545},
	keywords = {Architecture, Property},
	pages = {764--781},
}

@article{habibis_housing_2019,
	title = {Housing policy in remote {Indigenous} communities: how politics obstructs good policy},
	volume = {34},
	issn = {0267-3037},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02673037.2018.1487039},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1487039},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Housing Studies},
	author = {Habibis, Daphne and Phillips, Rhonda and Phibbs, Peter},
	year = {2019},
	note = {Number: 2
Publisher: Taylor \& Francis},
	keywords = {Architecture, Property, Urban planning},
	pages = {252--271},
}